Three emails. Two deadlines. Zero lawsuits.
And now, a new demand from Philipp Redeker, “Managing Partner” of a German recruitment agency called OneOutOfHundred.com:
“You hide, hide, hide…. You are deliberately publishing personal data under the protection of anonymity, without consent, and without any identifiable accountability. … identify yourselves, disclose your operators, and take responsibility for your claims. Anonymous defamation is not credibility—it is avoidance. Your clear name? your identity? Your address? I am waiting.”
Well, Herr Redeker, you are waiting.
And you will keep waiting.
Because Defequer is an anonymous satirical website. That is not a bug. It is a feature. We roast overpriced domains and delusional sellers. We do not roast people‘s real names, addresses, or families. We roast public Sedo listings, public WHOIS data, and public emails that people send us (with permission).
You are demanding that we “identify ourselves” as if we were a party to a lawsuit. But you have not filed a lawsuit. You have not obtained a court order. You have not even identified your own client – assuming you have one.
So let us explain, in plain terms, why your demand is legally baseless, professionally embarrassing, and satirically delicious.
Anonymous Speech Is Protected Speech – Even in Germany
You are writing from Germany, Herr Redeker. Germany has strong data protection laws (DSGVO/GDPR). But Germany also protects anonymous speech under Article 5 of the German Basic Law (Grundgesetz) – freedom of expression – and the European Convention on Human Rights.
Anonymous satire has a long and honourable tradition. From the Letters of Junius in the 18th century to the blog “Gawker” (RIP) to countless whistleblower platforms today, anonymity allows critics to speak without fear of retaliation. In the domain industry, anonymity is particularly important because sellers and buyers can be vindictive – as you are demonstrating.
You claim we are “publishing personal data under the protection of anonymity, without consent.” That is false. We have not published any personal data. We published your email after you sent it to us. You consented to that communication. We did not reveal your home address, your private phone number, or anything beyond what you voluntarily included in your signature.
If you did not want your email published, you should not have sent it to a satirical website known for roasting people. That is like yelling at a comedian and then being surprised when the joke is on you.
You Have No Standing to Demand Our Identity
You are not a court. You are not a law enforcement agency. You are not even a lawyer. You are a “Managing Partner” of a recruitment agency that, according to your website, helps companies find candidates and manage rejection letters.
You have no legal standing to demand our “clear name, identity, and address.” None. Zero. Nichts.
If you were serious about pursuing legal action, you would have filed a lawsuit by now. In that lawsuit, you would ask the court to issue an order requiring our hosting provider or registrar to disclose our identity. That is how the process works. You do not get to skip the court and demand directly.
The fact that you have not done this – and instead sent three increasingly desperate emails – tells us everything we need to know: you have no case, no client, and no lawyer willing to take this on.
So go ahead, Herr Redeker. Keep waiting. We will be here. Anonymous. Satirical. Untouchable.
What Exactly Do You Claim Is “Defamatory”?
You have not specified. Your first email vaguely complained about “false legal characterization,” “unsupported trademark assertions,” and “defamatory labels such as cybersquatting.” Your second email simply demands our identity.
Let us remind you: our original article never named you. It never named the domain seller. It never claimed that the seller was a specific person. It simply stated facts:
- The domain
saudinationalteam.comwas registered on 15 March 2025. - It was listed for sale at $15,975,025.
- The seller had no apparent connection to the Saudi national team.
- Registering a domain that mimics a famous entity and offering it for an enormous price is evidence of bad faith under the UDRP.
None of those statements are false. None of those statements are defamatory. And none of those statements require us to reveal our real names.
If you believe otherwise, sue us. We will gladly defend the truth in court. But you will not, because you cannot.
The Irony of a Recruitment Agency Demanding Transparency
We cannot let this pass without comment: you run a company called OneOutOfHundred.com. Your website (which we have visited many times, thank you for the traffic) does not list your personal home address. It does not list the names of every employee. It does not disclose the personal data of every candidate you place.
Your company enjoys the protection of being a legal entity. You are not required to publish your managing partner‘s home address on your homepage. That is normal.
Defequer operates as an anonymous collective. We are not a registered company. We do not have a physical office. We are a blog. That is legal. That is common. That is not “hiding.”
What is hiding, Herr Redeker, is you refusing to name your client. Who are you representing? The domain seller? The Saudi Arabian Football Federation? Yourself? You have not disclosed that. You demand our identity while hiding your own principal.
That is not just hypocritical. That is amateur.
A Final Offer (Since You Like Ultimatums)
You gave us a deadline. We gave you one. You ignored ours. Now we will give you another.
You have until 1 May 2026, 6 PM CET to:
- File a lawsuit against Defequer in a competent court and provide us with the case number; or
- Publicly identify the client on whose behalf you are making these demands (if any); or
- Cease communication permanently.
If you choose option 3, we will consider the matter closed. You go back to recruiting. We go back to roasting. Everyone wins.
If you choose option 1, we will see you in court. Bring evidence. Bring popcorn.
If you choose option 2, we will evaluate whether your client has any legitimate grievance (they do not) and respond accordingly.
But if you continue to send harassing emails demanding our personal information without legal authority, we will:
- Publish each one.
- Roast each one.
- Make sure what you have done remain on Search Engines.
Your move, Herr Redeker.
The Bottom Line – We Are Not Afraid of You
Your bluster is transparent. Your legal threats are empty. Your demands for our identity are legally meaningless. And your recruitment agency has nothing to do with domain law.
Defequer will continue to operate anonymously, as millions of bloggers do worldwide. We will continue to roast delusional domain listings. And we will continue to publish emails from people who mistakenly believe that sending a “final notice” gives them power.
You are not powerful, Herr Redeker. You are just loud. And on the internet, loud without substance is just background noise.
Defequer Rating for Philipp Redeker’s Identity Demand: 💩💩💩💩 (4/5 shits)
We deduct one shit because this follow‑up is less creative than the first. The “you hide, hide, hide” schoolyard taunt is beneath you, Herr Redeker. Four shits for demanding anonymity while hiding your own client, confusing a satirical blog with a legal adversary, and thinking “I am waiting” is a persuasive legal argument.
Roast served. Anonymity defended. Next frivolous demand, please.
Post‑Script to Our Readers
Dear Defequer community,
We promised you we would not back down. We meant it.
We have received three emails from Philipp Redeker. We have published two responses. We have not removed a single word of our original article.
If he sues, we will tell you. If he does not, we will tell you that too. Either way, we will keep roasting.
Thank you for your support. And if you are a domain seller with a $16 million asking price for a one‑year‑old trademark‑infringing name: we are still watching.
Defequer Editorial Team
(Anonymous. Satirical. Unafraid.)